Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Double Murder of Daughters — Brutal and Premeditated Act Falls Under Rarest of Rare Doctrine. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC for throwing two minor daughters into a well, finding the circumstantial evidence complete and the death sentence appropriate.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 104
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to the confirmation of death sentence awarded to Mahendra Bhaskar Pavre by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mehkar, in Sessions Trial No.42/2014 for the murder of his two minor daughters, Kalyani (5 years) and Shital (2 years). The prosecution case was that on 24.01.2014, the accused returned home in an inebriated condition, quarreled with his wife Chhaya, and slapped his father-in-law Tejrao. The next morning, on 26.01.2014, the accused took his two daughters on the pretext of buying biscuits and chocolates, and threw them into a well in the field of Arjunrao. He later informed Bhimrao Salve about the act. The bodies were recovered, and post-mortem confirmed drowning as the cause of death. The accused was charged under Sections 302 and 376 IPC, but the trial court acquitted him of the rape charge. The High Court considered the confirmation case and the appeal against conviction. The court analyzed the circumstantial evidence, including the last seen theory, the accused's extra-judicial confession to Bhimrao, and the medical evidence. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. On the question of sentence, the court noted that the accused had committed a premeditated and brutal murder of his own defenseless children without any provocation, and showed no remorse. The court concluded that the case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category and confirmed the death sentence. The appeal against conviction was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Death Sentence - Rarest of Rare Doctrine - Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Confirmation of death sentence for murder of two minor daughters by throwing them into a well - Court held that the act was premeditated, brutal, and without any provocation, and the accused showed no remorse - The case falls within the 'rarest of rare' category, warranting death penalty (Paras 1-10).

B) Evidence Law - Circumstantial Evidence - Last Seen Theory - Sections 106, 114, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Accused was last seen with the deceased children and soon after informed a witness that he had thrown them into a well - Court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the accused (Paras 3-5).

C) Criminal Law - Motive - Section 8, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Accused had quarreled with his wife the previous night and was in an inebriated condition - Court held that the motive was established by the prior altercation and the accused's conduct (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the death sentence imposed on the accused for the murder of his two minor daughters is sustainable and whether the case falls within the 'rarest of rare' category.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court confirmed the death sentence awarded to Mahendra Bhaskar Pavre and dismissed his appeal against conviction.

Law Points

  • Death sentence confirmation
  • Rarest of rare doctrine
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 376 IPC
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Motive
  • Premeditation
  • Brutality
  • Child victim
  • Dying declaration
  • Last seen theory
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (10) 152

Criminal Confirmation Case No. 2/2016 with Criminal Appeal No. 276/2016

2016-10-13

B.P. Dharmadhikari, A.S. Chandurkar

Mr. S.M. Ukey, Addl. P.P. with Mr. N.B. Jawade, P.P. for State; Mr. S.P. Gadling and Mr. N.B. Rathod, Advocates for Accused

State of Maharashtra (in Confirmation Case); Mahendra Bhaskar Pavre (in Appeal)

Mahendra Bhaskar Pavre (in Confirmation Case); State of Maharashtra (in Appeal)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Confirmation of death sentence and appeal against conviction for murder of two minor daughters.

Remedy Sought

State sought confirmation of death sentence; accused sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Accused was sentenced to death by trial court; mandatory confirmation by High Court; accused appealed against conviction.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted accused under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to death; acquitted under Section 376 IPC.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable on the basis of circumstantial evidence. Whether the death sentence is appropriate and falls within the 'rarest of rare' category.

Submissions/Arguments

Prosecution argued that the accused was last seen with the deceased, made an extra-judicial confession, and the medical evidence supported drowning. Defense argued that the evidence was circumstantial and did not exclude the possibility of suicide or accident, and that the death sentence was excessive.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the chain of circumstantial evidence was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the accused. The murder of two defenseless children by their father in a premeditated and brutal manner, without any provocation, and with no remorse, falls within the 'rarest of rare' category, warranting the death penalty.

Judgment Excerpts

Accused Mahendra Bhaskar Pavre has been sentenced to death by Additional Sessions Judge (Link Court), Mehkar vide judgment dated 16.05.2016 in Sessions Trial No.42/2014. He lifted Shital in his arms and led Kalyani by holding hand. He told them that they would go to bring biscuits and chocolates. At 7.30 a.m. Mahendra informed Bhimrao Salve (P.W.4), that he had thrown both the daughters in a well located in the field of said Bhimrao's brother by name Arjunrao (P.W.3).

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the accused on 16.05.2016 and sentenced him to death. The matter was referred to the High Court for confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 CrPC. The accused also filed an appeal against conviction. Both matters were heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 376
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 106, 114, 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Double Murder of Daughters — Brutal and Premeditated Act Falls Under Rarest of Rare Doctrine. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC for throwing two minor daughters into a wel...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Corruption Case Against Police Constable. Court holds that Anti Corruption Bureau is a police station under Section 2(s) CrPC and registration of FIR by its officer is valid.