Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of 5-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Sustained Based on Direct Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Amir Nyamatkha Tadvi, was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment. The victim was a 5-year-old girl. The incident occurred on 28 May 2002 at about 7:00 p.m. in the village Loni, Tahsil Jamner. The victim's father, Sanjay Mhaske (PW2), was sitting in the courtyard of his house when he heard the victim shouting 'Baba, Baba'. He, along with his elder brother and wife, rushed to the Samaj Mandir behind the house. They saw the appellant sitting with the victim on his thighs, giving jerks to commit rape. The victim was crying. On seeing them, the appellant pushed the victim aside and ran away. The elder brother chased him but he escaped through a field. The father noticed blood coming from the victim's private part. The victim disclosed that the appellant called her, removed her underwear, and made her sit on his thighs. The father then went to the police station and lodged an FIR. The appellant was arrested and charged. The trial court convicted him. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of PW2 (father), PW3 (victim's mother), PW4 (medical officer), and PW5 (investigating officer). The medical evidence confirmed injuries on the victim's private parts. The court found the prosecution witnesses credible and the medical evidence corroborative. The court held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and life sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Rape of Minor - Section 376(2)(f) IPC - Life Imprisonment - Appeal against conviction for rape of a 5-year-old girl - The appellant was convicted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment - The High Court upheld the conviction based on the testimony of the victim's father (PW2) who witnessed the act, the medical evidence confirming injuries, and the prompt FIR - Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for rape of a 5-year-old girl is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under Section 376(2)(f) IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Rape of minor
  • Life imprisonment
  • Section 376(2)(f) IPC
  • Testimony of child victim
  • Medical evidence
  • Corroboration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (01) 29

Criminal Appeal No. 395 of 2003

2018-01-11

T.V. Nalawade, S.M. Gavhane

Mr. A.R. Rathod for appellant, Mr. S.D. Ghayal, APP for respondent/State

Amir Nyamatkha Tadvi

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for rape of a minor

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for rape of a 5-year-old girl

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical report

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt State argued that the evidence of PW2 (father) and medical evidence clearly established the offence

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of the victim's father (PW2) who witnessed the act, coupled with the medical evidence confirming injuries on the victim's private parts, and the prompt FIR, establish the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC is sustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Trial Court has convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under section 376 (2) (f) of Indian Penal Code for committing the offence of rape on a girl aged about 5 years and he is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life. After reaching the spot, they noticed that the accused had kept the victim girl on his thighs and in sitting position he was giving jerks for committing rape on the victim girl and the victim girl was crying.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case No. 92/2002 for offence under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 395/2003 before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and dismissed on 11 January 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376(2)(f)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Hindu Temple in Suit for Possession of Salt Pan Lands; Upholds Permanent Lease in Favor of Government Under Regulation 1 of 1805. Fixed Annual Compensation of 1848 Pagodas and Possession Since 1806 Held to Evidence P...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee in Income Tax Act, 1922 Deduction Case. Payment Made Due to Statutory Default in Deducting Tax at Source from Foreign Collaborator's Fees Not Deductible as Business Expenditure or Bad Debt Under Sections 10(2)(xi) and...