Search Results for "Civil Registrar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Civil Registrar"

4081 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4081 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Election Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, a Non-Member of the Federation and Its Member Societies, Cannot Challenge Election of Directors Under Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Madhav Atmaram Sahakari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Relief Orders in Service Disputes. Held that Industrial Court has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

30 Nov -0001

The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Vice-Chancellor filed four writ petitions (WP Nos. 2966/2011, 2967/2011, 2968/2011, 2969/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Bank's Petition to Recover Training Costs from Employees Who Resigned After Training — Training Bond Enforceable Under Contract Law. The court held that training bonds are not unconscionable and the bank is entitled to recover actual training costs under Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as the employees voluntarily executed the bonds and the bank incurred expenses.

12 Jul 2023

The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition filed by The Satara District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the Bank), challenged the order of the Commissi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Trade Mark Infringement Case — Allegation that FIR was Wrongly Registered Under Copyright Act to Bypass Procedures Under Trade Marks Act. Petitioner Contends Non-Compliance with Section 115(4) Proviso of Trade Marks Act, 1999 as Search and Seizure Conducted Without Opinion of Registrar.

8 Jul 2024

The petitioner, proprietor of an oil mill trading in gram flour under the brand 'MRS Ganapathi', filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Jan 2014

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refers Questions on Scope of Appellate Interference in Interim Injunction Orders to Larger Bench. Division Bench Noted Conflict Between Precedents on Whether Injunction Orders Are Discretionary or Prima Facie Adjudication, Impacting Appeal Scope Under Order 43 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

28 Apr 2025

The Bombay High Court, constituted as a larger bench, was seized of a reference made by a Division Bench owing to irreconcilable conflict in precedent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Alteration of Share Capital — Interim Relief Granted to Protect Plaintiff's Rights Pending Suit. The court held that the plaintiff, a director, had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim injunction against the company and other directors regarding the alteration of share capital from Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in the Memorandum of Association.

1 Aug 2017

The case involves a dispute within a family-owned company, H. Fillunger & Company Pvt. Ltd., where the plaintiff, Ajit Arvind Marathe, a director, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Dispute Under Section 91 of MCS Act Maintainable Against Expulsion Under Section 35. Cooperative Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Validity of Expulsion Resolution, Remedy Under Section 91 Not Barred by Section 35 Appeal.

4 Oct 2013

The appellant, a member of the respondent housing society, filed a dispute under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 before ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

1 Aug 2026

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sugar Factory Elections Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Court holds that election disputes must be resolved through the specific remedy under Section 91 of the MCS Act, not by writ petition.

20 Apr 2015

The petitioners, 14 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election of the Board of Directo...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)