Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sugar Factory Elections Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Court holds that election disputes must be resolved through the specific remedy under Section 91 of the MCS Act, not by writ petition.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, 14 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election of the Board of Directors of a sugar factory, a co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. They alleged irregularities in the election process. The court examined the maintainability of the petition in light of the alternative remedy available under Section 91 of the MCS Act. The court noted that Section 91 provides for reference of disputes relating to the constitution, management, or business of a co-operative society to the Co-operative Court. The court held that the election dispute falls squarely within the ambit of Section 91, and the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy. Therefore, the writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations. The court also observed that the petitioners could approach the appropriate forum under the MCS Act.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Election Dispute - Maintainability of Writ Petition - Alternative Remedy - Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The petitioners challenged the election of the Board of Directors of a sugar factory. The court held that the dispute regarding election falls within the purview of Section 91 of the MCS Act, which provides a specific remedy. Therefore, the writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable as the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable to challenge the election of a co-operative society when an alternative statutory remedy under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is available.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the appropriate forum under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Law Points

  • Election disputes under co-operative societies must be resolved through statutory remedy under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • not by writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015:BHC-AS:10161

Writ Petition No.3679 of 2015

2015-04-20

2015:BHC-AS:10161

Shri Vilasrao Bhauso Shinde & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 challenging election of Board of Directors of a sugar factory co-operative society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to challenge the election of the Board of Directors of the sugar factory.

Filing Reason

Alleged irregularities in the election process of the co-operative society.

Issues

Whether the writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy under Section 91 of the MCS Act is available.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the election was conducted with irregularities. Respondent (implied) argued that the dispute falls under Section 91 of the MCS Act and the writ petition is not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

Election disputes of co-operative societies must be resolved through the specific remedy under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and not by a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as an efficacious alternative remedy exists.

Judgment Excerpts

The dispute regarding election falls within the purview of Section 91 of the MCS Act, which provides a specific remedy.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court challenging the election of the Board of Directors of a sugar factory. The court heard the matter on the question of maintainability and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 91
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sugar Factory Elections Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Court holds that election disputes must be resolved through the specific remedy under Section 91 of the MCS Act, not by writ p...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Appeals of Councillors Against Dismissal of Writ Petitions Challenging Disqualification for Defection Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Dismissing Petitions at Threshold ...