Search Results for "tort"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Attachment of Bank Accounts in Arbitration Dispute. Section 37 Appeal Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails as Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Prima Facie Case or Irreparable Loss.

The petitioner, Ajazul Haque Khan, filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated January...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Vague and Omnibus Allegations Against Family Members Without Active Involvement Do Not Attract Offences Under Sections 498A and 494 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the accused-appellants, who were the father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the complainant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Canter Driver Upheld. Claimants, parents of deceased aged 45, awarded enhanced compensation with 40% future prospects and multiplier of 14 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, Sri Thimmappa @ Pooja Thimmappa and Smt. Sujathamma @ Pooja Ramanjanappagari Sujathamma, who are the parents of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence — Dog on Road Caused Rider to Fall, Not Vehicle Impact. Claimant's Son Died After Losing Control of Motorcycle While Avoiding a Dog; Insurance Company's Appeal Partly Allowed Reducing Liability by 50%.

The appeal was filed by the Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 28.02.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of 55-Year-Old in Motor Vehicle Accident, Upholds Negligence Finding Against Driver. Multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma, future prospects at 10%, and conventional heads enhanced under Pranay Sethi.

This judgment arises from two cross-appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 23.03.2021 in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Tribunal's use of multiplier '13' for a 61-year-old claimant was contrary to Sarla Verma v. DTC guidelines; correct multiplier is '9'.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Removal of Petitioner's Name from Digital Records in Quashed Criminal Case — Right to be Forgotten Upheld. Petitioner's Right to Privacy under Article 21 Prevails Over Public Access to Quashed Proceedings.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Registrar General of the High ...