Search Results for "investigation challenge"

3465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Police Officers. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of weapons held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 307, 353, 201 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act.

The case involves two appeals filed by Raju @ Mukesh Punamchand Dangre and Dipak @ Golu Ananda Tayde against their conviction and sentence by the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. Section 167(2) CrPC Entitles Accused to Indefeasible Right to Bail if Investigation Not Completed Within Statutory Period.

The appellants, nine individuals, were arrested in connection with Crime No. 179 of 2018 registered at Anandnagar Police Station, Osmanabad, for vario...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010059832012_1

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...