High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Cold Storage Firm in Cattle Transport Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. Alleged illegal transport of cows for slaughter fails as cows were being taken to a cold storage facility, not a slaughterhouse, and no evidence of slaughter intent.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 122
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Shrusthi Agro & Cold Storage and its partners, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of the complaint and FIR dated 26.02.2018 registered at Mal Maruti Police Station, Belagavi, and all pending proceedings before the II JMFC Court, Belagavi. The FIR alleged offences under Section 420 read with 429 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), Sections 11, 9, 8, and 4 of the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Protection Act, 1964, and Section 11(1)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The background of the dispute involves the second respondent, Smt. Joshine, who filed a complaint claiming that the petitioners illegally transported cows meant for slaughter, causing cruelty and cheating. The facts reveal that on the alleged date, the petitioners' vehicle carrying cows was intercepted by the police. The petitioners contended that the cows were being transported to their cold storage facility for preservation, not for slaughter. The legal issues centered on whether the FIR disclosed a prima facie case for the alleged offences. The petitioners argued that the transport of cows is not prohibited under the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act unless it is for slaughter, and there was no evidence of slaughter intent. The respondents argued that the transport without a valid permit and the condition of the cows indicated cruelty and intent to slaughter. The court's analysis examined the provisions of the Acts and found that the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act prohibits slaughter of cows but does not prohibit transport per se. The court noted that the complaint lacked specific allegations of cruelty or cheating. The court held that no prima facie case was made out against the petitioners and that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. The decision was to allow the petition and quash the FIR and all proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Inherent Powers - The court examined whether the FIR and complaint disclosed a prima facie case against the petitioners for alleged illegal transport of cows for slaughter. Held that the allegations did not make out any offence as the cows were being transported to a cold storage facility, not a slaughterhouse, and there was no evidence of intent to slaughter. (Paras 2-10)

B) Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Protection Act, 1964 - Sections 4, 8, 9, 11 - Transport of Cows - The court considered whether the transport of cows in a vehicle without a valid permit constituted an offence under the Act. Held that the Act prohibits slaughter of cows but does not prohibit transport per se; the prosecution failed to show that the transport was for slaughter. (Paras 5-8)

C) Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Section 11(1)(d) - Cruelty to Animals - The court examined whether the manner of transport caused unnecessary pain or suffering. Held that there was no evidence of cruelty as the cows were being transported in a vehicle with proper arrangements. (Paras 6-9)

D) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420 and 429 - Cheating and Mischief - The court assessed whether the allegations of cheating and mischief were made out. Held that there was no deception or damage to property as alleged; the complaint was vague and lacked specific details. (Paras 4-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and proceedings against the petitioners for offences under Section 420 r/w 429 IPC, Sections 11, 9, 8, 4 of Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Protection Act, 1964, and Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 should be quashed for lack of prima facie case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The complaint and FIR dated 26.02.2018 (Annexures-A and A-1) and all pending proceedings on the file of II JMFC Court, Belagavi, are quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  • Prima facie case
  • Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Protection Act
  • 1964
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
  • 1960
  • Sections 420 and 429 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 41

Criminal Petition No.100702/2018

2019-01-25

H.P. Sandesh

Sri.Santosh Pujari, Sri.Praveen K Uppar, Sri.G.S.Mot

Shrusthi Agro & Cold Storage, Amol S/o Vidyadhar Mohandas, Smt. Siyona W/o Amol Mohandas

The State of Karnataka, Smt. Joshine D/o Antony Feorge

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR and proceedings for alleged offences under IPC, Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of complaint and FIR dated 26.02.2018 and all pending proceedings before II JMFC Court, Belagavi.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the FIR did not disclose any prima facie offence and that the proceedings were an abuse of process of law.

Issues

Whether the FIR and proceedings disclose a prima facie case for offences under Section 420 r/w 429 IPC, Sections 11, 9, 8, 4 of Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Protection Act, 1964, and Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. Whether the continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the transport of cows is not prohibited under the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act unless for slaughter, and there was no evidence of slaughter intent. They also argued that the cows were being taken to a cold storage facility, not a slaughterhouse. Respondents argued that the transport without a valid permit and the condition of the cows indicated cruelty and intent to slaughter, and that the FIR disclosed a prima facie case.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the allegations in the FIR did not make out any prima facie offence under the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act as the transport of cows is not prohibited unless for slaughter, and there was no evidence of slaughter intent. The court also found no evidence of cruelty or cheating. Therefore, continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard the petitioners’ counsel and the learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 and the learned counsel for respondent No.2. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to admit the petition, call for records & quash the complaint & FIR dtd.26.02.2018 vide Annexures-A & A-1 & all the pending proceedings on the file of II JMFC Court, Belagavi filed against the petitioners pertaining to offences punishable under Section 420 r/w 429 of IPC, Section 11, r/w 9, 8 & 4, of Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter & Cattle Protection Act 1964 & Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 vide Annexure-G.

Procedural History

The complaint was filed by respondent No.2 on 26.02.2018, leading to FIR at Mal Maruti Police Station. The petitioners filed Criminal Petition No.100702/2018 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seeking quashing. The petition was heard and reserved for judgment on 07.01.2019, and order pronounced on 25.01.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 420, 429
  • Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Protection Act, 1964: 4, 8, 9, 11
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960: 11(1)(d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Cold Storage Firm in Cattle Transport Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. Alleged illegal transport of cows for slaughter fails as cows were being taken to a cold s...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.