Search Results for "contingent interest"

403 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 403 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute Over Hypothecated Assets. Court allows appointment of Receiver under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to preserve assets pending arbitration.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute. Court Allows Appointment of Receiver to Secure Hypothecated Assets Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed three applications before the Madras High Court: Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Developer. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled, No Enforceable Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The plaintiffs, a group of 52 individuals, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement for sale of flats in a building to be constru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Interim Compensation Order in Lease Dispute. Appellate court's order granting interim compensation under Section 43(1) of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 upheld as compensatory and not penal.

The petitioners, heirs of the original lessee Hashambhai Jetha, were granted a lease of a plot of land admeasuring 3341 sq. yards by an Indenture of L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Amalgamation Scheme Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 — No Objections Raised by Regional Director or Official Liquidator. Court Held Scheme Fair and Reasonable and Not Contrary to Public Interest.

The Bombay High Court, exercising its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, considered two company petitions filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Co...