Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

299 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Lower Appellate Court Failed to Re-appreciate Evidence. The Court held that the first appellate court's non-application of mind to evidence constituted a substantial question of law under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, warranting remand for fresh consideration.

12 Nov 2025

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Krishnabai Babya Navale, challenging the judgment dated 21.01.2017 passed by the le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Article 227. The court held that the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the trial court and the first appellate court in a suit for partition and separate possession were based on proper appreciation of evidence and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Divakar Savleram Torne, Dinkar Savleram Torne, and Pramod Dinkar Torne, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

31 Mar 2017

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

20 Jul 2026

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Single Judge Can Hear Petitions Under Article 226/227 Against Any Judicial/Quasi-Judicial Order, Not Limited to Listed Acts. The Full Bench resolves the conflict and clarifies that Rule 18 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 is procedural and does not restrict the Single Judge's jurisdiction to specific Acts.

4 Oct 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed by M/s. Magnum Opus IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd. under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an o...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes SSRD Order in Land Revenue Revision Case — Upholds Validity of Registered Sale Deed and Entry No.3298. Petitioner's Title Based on Registered Sale Deed Cannot Be Disturbed by Suo-Motu Revision After 11 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties.

13 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Hitenbhai Gumanbhai Modi, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

High Court

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 835 OF 2022

1 Jan 1970

...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)