Search Results for "private temple trust"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Closure Order Against LPG Dispensing Station for Violation of Natural Justice. License Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Violating Principles of Audi Alteram Partem Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sipani Energy Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, engaged in the business of manufacturing, stocking, and distribution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defamatory Social Media Posts in Personality Rights Case. Court restrains respondent from publishing false or malicious content about applicant's character and professional reputation pending trial.

The applicant, T. Rangaraj, filed a suit and interim applications before the Madras High Court seeking a permanent injunction and interim relief again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Civil Suit — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The court held that the trial court's order was a plausible view and did not warrant interference under Article 227.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...