WRIT PETITION NO.18995 OF 2024
4 Apr 2025The litigation arose from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the implementation of a Slum Rehabilitation S...
Search Results for "ownership certificate"
1682 result(s) found
Found 1682 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Applicability of Affordable Housing Notification to Petitioners' Land. Clause 3 of Notification Dated 8th February 2016 Quashed as It Modified Development Control Regulations Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
23 Sep 2022The petitioners, Anwar Hussain J. Thim and M/s. Amit Builders, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Maintenance Charges — Management, Maintenance or Repair Service Not Attracted. Amounts collected as maintenance charges for upkeep of apartment premises are not subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994.
25 Jan 2018The judgment involves three appeals filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax/Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appell...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
29 Apr 2016The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...
- 272
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.
23 Jul 2019The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...
- 43
High Court
Madras High Court Grants Decree for Unpaid Shrimp Supply in Commercial Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Principal Amount with Interest at 6% Per Annum. Court Holds That Invoices and Purchase Orders Constitute Valid Contracts and That Interest at Contractual Rate of 18% Is Not Automatically Awardable.
23 Jan 2025The plaintiff, M/s Five Star Marine Exports Private Limited, filed a suit against the defendants, SEA WEALTH PRODUCTS INC. and its President Mr. Paul ...
- 55
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Revision Petitions Challenging Denial of CST Exemption for Lease Transactions; Examines Whether Post-Import Lease Constitutes Sale in Course of Import Under Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The court analyzed the transaction structure, including master lease agreements, purchase orders, bills of entry, and acceptance certificates, to determine if the lease occasioned import or involved transfer of documents before customs clearance.
19 Feb 2016Background: The dispute involves tax revision petitions filed by Hewlett Packard Financial Services India Private Limited (the petitioner) against the...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Court Fees Dispute for Injunction Suit. Suit for Simplicitor Injunction Falls Under Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court Fees Act, Not Section 6(iv)(d) for Possession.
13 Feb 2013The case involves a writ petition filed by the Plaintiffs (Lalchand Kalro and others) against the Respondents (Neeraj Lalchand Kalro and others) chall...
- 164
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022
2 May 2025The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Corporation in Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Case; Upholds Provisions Requiring Deposit of Carcasses Without Sale. Provisions Are Reasonable Restrictions Under Articles 19(1)(f) and (g) and Not Acquisitions Requiring Compensation Under Article 31(2) as They Prevent Danger to Public Health Under Article 31(5)(b)(ii).
15 Oct 1968The case arose from a constitutional challenge to certain provisions of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, as amended by Act 14 of 1961, whic...
- 87
