Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Examines Challenge to Regularisation Certificate Issued Under Mixe...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Challenging High Court’s Order Dismissing Absorpti...

Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

365 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 365 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

29 Apr 2026

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

5 Feb 2024

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Dispute Over 'Anna' for South Indian Eateries - Prior User Fails to Establish Infringement Due to Generic Nature of Mark. The court held that the word 'Anna' is generic and cannot be exclusively appropriated, rejecting the claim of trademark infringement and passing off under the Trademarks Act, 1999.

30 Nov 2023

The dispute arose between two eatery owners in Pune over the use of the word 'Anna' in their restaurant names. The Appellant-Plaintiff, Shantapa alias...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Taking Cognizance Against Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Section 52A — Statement Recorded Without Proper Safeguards Eschewed. The court held that the mandatory requirement of Section 52A of the NDPS Act, 1985 to produce seized contraband before the court for certification of inventory was not complied with, rendering the prosecution unsustainable.

28 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Mr. Emmanuel Michael, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Termination. Court Holds That Termination of Development Agreement by Cooperative Housing Society Was Valid and Appellant Failed to Make Out a Prima Facie Case for Interim Protection Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Aug 2016

The appellant, M/s. Amisha Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Confirms Death Sentence for Four Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 396, 397, 302, 120-B, 201 IPC and Section 98 Karnataka Police Act Upheld. The court found the evidence of last seen, recovery of stolen articles, and extra-judicial confession sufficient to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category for death penalty.

5 Jul 2016

The case pertains to a dacoity and murder incident that occurred on 14.2.2009 at about 11.45 p.m. in Saidapur Police Station limits, Yadgir District. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Confirms Death Sentence for Four Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 396, 397, 302 IPC Upheld. Court Finds Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

5 Jul 2016

The case pertains to a dacoity and murder that occurred on the night of 14th February 2009. The prosecution alleged that the four accused, Basavaraj @...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Challenge to EPF Damages Order — Delay and Lack of Jurisdictional Error. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any error in the order imposing damages under Section 14-B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.

18 Sep 2013

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd, challenged an order dated 19.05.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposing damage...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

6 Nov 2012

The case pertains to an appeal by the original accused (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) against their conviction under Sections 498-A and 3...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)