High Court of Karnataka Confirms Death Sentence for Four Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 396, 397, 302, 120-B, 201 IPC and Section 98 Karnataka Police Act Upheld. The court found the evidence of last seen, recovery of stolen articles, and extra-judicial confession sufficient to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category for death penalty.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to a dacoity and murder incident that occurred on 14.2.2009 at about 11.45 p.m. in Saidapur Police Station limits, Yadgir District. The prosecution alleged that the four accused, Basavaraj @ Basya, Palya, Yankappa @ Yankya, and Ramesh @ Ramya, along with others, committed dacoity and murdered the victims. The trial court, the District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No.48/2010, convicted the accused under Sections 120-B, 396, 397, 302 read with 34 IPC and 201 read with 34 IPC and Section 98 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963, and sentenced them to death. The matter came before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, as a Criminal Reference Case under Section 366 CrPC for confirmation of the death sentence, and also as a Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC filed by the accused challenging the conviction and sentence. The High Court, after hearing both sides, examined the evidence including last seen evidence, recovery of stolen articles, and extra-judicial confession. The court found the evidence sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. On the question of sentence, the court considered the nature of the offence and the circumstances, and held that the case falls within the 'rarest of rare' category, warranting the death penalty. Consequently, the High Court confirmed the death sentence and dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dacoity with Murder - Section 396 IPC - Conviction - The trial court convicted the accused for dacoity with murder based on evidence of last seen, recovery of stolen articles, and extra-judicial confession - The High Court upheld the conviction, finding the evidence sufficient to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 2-10).

B) Criminal Law - Death Sentence - Confirmation under Section 366 CrPC - The trial court imposed death sentence on all four accused - The High Court, after considering the gravity of the offence and the lack of mitigating circumstances, confirmed the death sentence, holding that the case falls within the 'rarest of rare' category (Paras 11-15).

C) Criminal Procedure - Appeal against Conviction - Section 374(2) CrPC - The accused appealed against the conviction and sentence - The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no merit in the grounds raised, and affirmed the trial court's judgment (Paras 16-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction and death sentence awarded by the trial court to the four accused for offences under Sections 120-B, 396, 397, 302 read with 34 IPC and 201 read with 34 IPC and Section 98 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963, is sustainable and whether the death sentence warrants confirmation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court confirmed the death sentence awarded to the four accused and dismissed the criminal appeal.

Law Points

  • Confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 CrPC
  • Appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC
  • Dacoity with murder under Section 396 IPC
  • Robbery under Section 397 IPC
  • Murder under Section 302 IPC
  • Criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC
  • Causing disappearance of evidence under Section 201 IPC
  • Offences under Karnataka Police Act
  • 1963 Section 98
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (07) 5

Criminal Reference Case No.51/2012 and Criminal Appeal No.3687/2012

2016-07-05

Justice Anand Byrareddy, Justice L. Narayana Swamy

Shri K.R. Keshavamurthy, Additional State Public Prosecutor; Shri Prakash Yeli, Additional State Public Prosecutor; Shri Shivanand N. Pattanshetty, Advocate for Respondents/Appellants

Basavaraj @ Basya, Palya, Yankappa @ Yankya, Ramesh @ Ramya

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Reference Case for confirmation of death sentence and Criminal Appeal against conviction and sentence.

Remedy Sought

The Additional Registrar General sought confirmation of death sentence; the accused sought setting aside of conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

The trial court imposed death sentence on the accused for dacoity and murder, requiring confirmation by the High Court; the accused appealed against the conviction and sentence.

Previous Decisions

The District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No.48/2010, convicted the accused and sentenced them to death on 3.10.2012.

Issues

Whether the conviction of the accused under Sections 120-B, 396, 397, 302 read with 34 IPC and 201 read with 34 IPC and Section 98 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963, is sustainable? Whether the death sentence awarded by the trial court warrants confirmation?

Submissions/Arguments

The prosecution argued that the evidence of last seen, recovery of stolen articles, and extra-judicial confession proved the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused argued that the evidence was insufficient and the sentence was excessive.

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence of last seen, recovery of stolen articles, and extra-judicial confession was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused for dacoity with murder under Section 396 IPC and other offences. The case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category, justifying the death penalty.

Judgment Excerpts

The case of the prosecution was that the Police Sub-Inspector, Saidapur Police Station of Yadgir District, as on 14.2.2009 at about 11.45 p.m., ... The reference by the court below as well as the appeal preferred against the judgment of the court below are heard and considered together.

Procedural History

The trial court (District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir) convicted the accused on 3.10.2012 in S.C. No.48/2010 and sentenced them to death. The matter was referred to the High Court under Section 366 CrPC for confirmation of death sentence, and the accused filed an appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC. The High Court heard both matters together and delivered judgment on 5.7.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 366, 374(2)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 120-B, 396, 397, 302, 34, 201
  • Karnataka Police Act, 1963: 98
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Relief in Partnership Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Appointment of Receiver or Injunction. Claim of sole heir to partnership assets fails as partnership deed provided for continuation of firm on ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit for Possession. Partition Deed of 1951 Held Not Proved, and Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Title and Possession Over Suit House.