Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Proceedings Under Section 32(2)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Decision to Terminate Proceedings as Unnecessary and Impossible Upheld as Within Jurisdiction.

The Arbitration Petition was filed by Sheil Properties Private Limited (Petitioner) under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions Against Rejection of Plaint in Arbitration-Related Suits. Court holds that bar under Section 5 of the Arbitration Act does not apply to suits challenging arbitral awards on grounds of fraud and jurisdictional error.

The case involves two civil revision petitions filed by M/s. Associated Constructions, a partnership firm, against the Executive Engineer of the Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Delivery — Respondent's Opposition on Grounds of Hardship Not Sustained. Court Permits Withdrawal Without Prejudice to Respondent's Rights Under the Award and Pending Proceedings.

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of a Single Judge dated 2 February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Loan Recovery Case. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 84 of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, finding no grounds for interference.

The petitioners, Vedansh Hospitality and Resorts Limited and two individuals, were original respondents in an arbitration proceeding initiated by New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim as Time-Barred. Claim for pre-project expenses under MOU held barred by limitation as expenditure incurred prior to April 2001 and claim raised after three years.

The Petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 12 November 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Foreign Award Execution Case Due to Property Location. Territorial jurisdiction for execution of foreign award under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is determined by location of property to be attached, not by place of cause of action.

The appellant, Wireless Developers Inc., a US company, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Indiagames Ltd., an Indian company, f...