Search Results for "Belagavi"

476 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 476 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Hindu Succession Act Case — Daughter Entitled to Share in Joint Family Property. Daughter's claim for partition and separate possession of 1/2 share in suit properties decreed, setting aside trial court's dismissal.

The Regular First Appeal was filed by the plaintiff, Smt. Mallawwa Laxman Yadahalli (since deceased, represented by her LR Smt. Parvati Gorawade), cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Substitution of Legal Representatives in Suit for Declaration of Will as Void — Order Passed Without Notice to Plaintiffs Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Order XXII Rule 5 CPC.

The petitioners, Smt. Sarojini and Kempanna, were defendants in O.S. No.342/2017 filed by Smt. Tayawwa before the Principal Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Principal's Petition for Regular Pension Based on Last Drawn Salary. Pensionary Benefits Must Be Calculated on Actual Last Pay Drawn at Retirement, Not Reduced Pay After Re-Employment, Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1964.

The petitioner, M.A. Dhavaleshwar, was appointed as a Professor on 26-07-1982 and later became Principal of Sangolli Rayanna Grade-I College, Rani Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Family Court Suit — Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected. Plaint Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Adamsaheb, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 15.07.2...