Search Results for "suit and counterclaim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "suit and counterclaim"

294 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

17 Feb 2026

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. Court upholds restraint on encashment of bank guarantee subject to deposit of amount, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's order under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

25 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mahaguj Collieries Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Case Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Award of Rs.1,26,46,303/- with Interest at 12% Per Annum. The court held that the arbitrator had applied his mind and there was no violation of natural justice or public policy.

23 Dec 2025

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Manmohan Bhimsen Goyal and Kavita Manmohan Goyal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Award declared firm dissolved on a date not claimed by any party and failed to consider crucial evidence regarding partnership property.

5 Jun 2017

The Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges an arbitral award dated 1st August 2006. The petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Air India Agents in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Dispute Held to Be Purely Civil in Nature. Court finds that allegations of misappropriation of ticket sales proceeds do not constitute criminal offences under Sections 403, 405, 409, 420, 425 IPC as the relationship between the parties is contractual and the dispute is civil.

20 Jun 2017

The petitioners, Nilesh N. Shah and Hema N. Shah, were partners of a partnership firm engaged in the business of selling air tickets. Air India Limite...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Challenge to Arbitral Award in Indian Premier League Franchise Dispute. Award Directed Payment of Damages and Interest to Franchisee; Petition Alleges Patent Illegality and Excess of Jurisdiction by Arbitrator.

16 Jun 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the governing body for crick...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Aug 2012

The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)