KAHC010034632013_1
21 Dec 2020...
Search Results for "pendency"
8683 result(s) found
Found 8683 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against Mamlatdar's Order in Land Dispute Under Goa Mamlatdar's Court Act, 1966. Concurrent findings of possession and title by Mamlatdar and Additional District Magistrate upheld as no perversity or error of law found.
23 Dec 2021The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the original defendants in a suit/application under the Goa, Daman and Diu Mamlatdar's Court Act,...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Regular First Appeal Challenging Decree Holding Sale Deeds Void Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act in Pending Partition Suit. Appeal contests application of lis pendens doctrine to nullify purchases made during pendency of suit, with court's analysis focusing on extent of co-heir rights in Mohammedan law.
31 Jan 2015The case arose from a partition suit filed by two Muslim women, Smt. Jameela Begum and Smt. Iqbal Begum, seeking their shares in the properties left b...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging School Tribunal Orders on Reinstatement of Private School Employees. Employees Sought Reinstatement and Back Wages After Termination Amid Management Disputes Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1978.
17 Jun 2016These two writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, sought quashing of orders passed by the School Tribunal, Mumbai, in Ap...
- 13
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal by Original Owners and Subsequent Purchasers — Holders Have No Locus as Land Vested in Government After Final Notification Under City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903; Sale During Pendency of Challenge Rendered Ineffective
28 Jul 2026Background: The case involved a land acquisition challenge under the City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903, initiated in 1981 for the formation of Vija...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
9 Jun 2026The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...
- 331
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award, Reduces Future Interest from 18% to 9%. Court upheld the arbitrator's findings on quantum but modified the future interest rate as excessive under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Jul 2012The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), a Central Government Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 3 July 2006 passed by a so...
- 175
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority List in KPTCL — Petitioner Fails to Establish Arbitrariness in Adoption of Zonal Seniority. The court upheld the principle of zonal seniority over state-wide seniority for Executive Engineers in KPTCL, finding no violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
14 Jul 2017The petitioner, Marthandappa S/o Ukkundappa Naikal, an Executive Engineer in the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), filed a wri...
- 156
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.
2 May 2025The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Landlord's Right to Resume Land for Personal Cultivation in Tenancy Dispute — Surrender of Tenancy Validated. The court held that the surrender of half the land by the tenant did not affect the landlord's right to resume the remaining land for personal cultivation under Section 38 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958.
12 Jan 2015The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants (original tenants) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High...
- 159
