High Court of Bombay at Nagpur hears writ petitions by several individuals against Nagpur Municipal Corporation regarding undisclosed matter.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "government service removal"
1751 result(s) found
Found 1751 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Corporation in Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Case; Upholds Provisions Requiring Deposit of Carcasses Without Sale. Provisions Are Reasonable Restrictions Under Articles 19(1)(f) and (g) and Not Acquisitions Requiring Compensation Under Article 31(2) as They Prevent Danger to Public Health Under Article 31(5)(b)(ii).
15 Oct 1968The case arose from a constitutional challenge to certain provisions of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, as amended by Act 14 of 1961, whic...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Action to Remove Unauthorized Vertical Extension in Notified Slum. Unauthorized Construction Cannot Be Protected Merely Because It Is Situated in a Slum Area.
3 Mar 2023The appellant, Mujibur Rehman Chaudhary, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay challenging a notice dated 31 December 2019 issued by th...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Compensation Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Court upholds Competent Authority's award of compensation for right of user over land for pipeline, finding no error in market value determination or procedural compliance.
27 Mar 2023The petitioner, Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the compensation awarded b...
- 91
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Applications to Modify Stray Dog Relocation Directions. The Court Analyzed the Applicability of Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023 to Institutional Areas and the Scope of Article 142.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the escalating menace of stray animals, particularly dogs, in institutional areas such as sc...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Non-Service of Requisition Copy Under Rule 2(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975 is Directory and Does Not Invalidate Motion When Sarpanch Had Notice and Participated.
28 Feb 2025The Petitioner, Priyanka Abhijeet Deodhare, was the Sarpanch of Village Kaddhe, Taluka Khed, District Pune. Elections to the Gram Panchayat were held ...
- 401
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Recognizes Menstrual Hygiene as Integral to Right to Education and Dignity. Court Emphasizes State's Obligation to Provide Free Sanitary Pads and Separate Toilets in Schools Under Articles 14, 21, and 21A.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by a social worker seeking judicial intervention to address the widespread lack of me...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating ST Certificate for Lack of Affinity Test. Caste Claim as 'Thakur' (ST) Upheld as Contemporaneous Documentary Evidence Outweighs Affinity Test Under Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001.
1 Aug 2018The petitioner, Monika Sunil Shinde, a 19-year-old resident of Ahmednagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challe...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion by Gram Sabha Invalid Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Directly Elected Sarpanch Under Section 30A-1A Cannot Be Removed by Gram Sabha; Only Voters Who Elected Him Can Pass No-Confidence Motion.
12 Jan 2022The petitioner, Amol Pandurang Godbole, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Balirampur in the 2017 general election, a post reserved...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revocation of Permission to Sell Trust Property in Bombay Public Trusts Act Case — Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Upheld as Sale Not for Benefit of Trust. Permission Under Section 36(1)(b) of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 Revoked Under Section 36(2) Due to Non-Compliance and Lack of Benefit to Trust.
11 Apr 2014The petitioner, M/s. Arole Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...
- 87
