Search Results for "controlling interest"

552 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 552 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Repeal of University Act — State's Power to Repeal Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14. Heritage Protection Justifies Singling Out Khalsa University for Repeal, Not Arbitrary.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the constitutional validity of the Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017, passed by the Punjab Legis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand Against Housing Society Due to Limitation Under Section 53A of Maharashtra Stamp Act. Demand raised beyond six-year period from Amnesty certificate under Section 41 is barred by time, and even otherwise, a 20-year delay is unreasonable.

The Petitioner, Uma Niwas Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd., a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Inquiry Report of Goa Human Rights Commission Against Police Inspector for Alleged Assault and Illegal Detention — Report Found to Violate Principles of Natural Justice and Be Based on No Evidence.

The petitioner, a Police Inspector, challenged an inquiry report dated 24.09.2015 of the Goa Human Rights Commission which found him guilty of violati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of PIL on Noise Pollution Citing Supreme Court Directions. Court directs strict enforcement of Noise Pollution Rules and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and mandates compliance with Supreme Court's comprehensive guidelines on firecrackers, loudspeakers, and silence zones.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Janhit Manch and others seeking enforcement of legal provisions for cont...