Search Results for "Taking Over Certificate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Taking Over Certificate"

4649 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4649 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Grants Decree for Unpaid Shrimp Supply in Commercial Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Principal Amount with Interest at 6% Per Annum. Court Holds That Invoices and Purchase Orders Constitute Valid Contracts and That Interest at Contractual Rate of 18% Is Not Automatically Awardable.

23 Jan 2025

The plaintiff, M/s Five Star Marine Exports Private Limited, filed a suit against the defendants, SEA WEALTH PRODUCTS INC. and its President Mr. Paul ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Rejection of Tender Bid for Arbitrary Application of Experience Criterion. The Court held that the tender evaluation committee's interpretation of 'experience of handling and transportation of food grains' was unreasonable and that the petitioner's experience in handling similar commodities should have been considered.

7 Apr 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Joshi Freight Carriers, a proprietary concern, challenged a communication dated 09.09.2006 issued by the Central Warehousing Corp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Constitutional Validity of Section 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Act Inserted by Maharashtra Act XVI of 1995. Petitioners Challenge Retrospective Withdrawal of Sales Tax Deferral Incentives Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1983, as Ultra Vires Constitution and Violative of Promissory Estoppel.

20 Aug 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction in Revision — Sentence Reduced to 4 Years R.I. Based on Credible Testimony of Prosecutrix Under Section 376 IPC. Minor Contradictions in Prosecution Evidence Do Not Warrant Acquittal as Testimony of Victim is Found Reliable and Trustworthy.

15 Dec 2006

The applicant, Tekaram s/o Krishna Ghormare, was convicted under Section 376 IPC by the 2nd Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhandara on 18.12.2003 in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Special Court Order Refusing Transfer of POCSO Case to Juvenile Justice Board — Accused Held to Be Juvenile on Date of Offence Based on School Records. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in age determination under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, and directed transfer of the case to the Juvenile Justice Board.

23 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Siddu @ Siddeshwar, was accused in Special Case No.4/2015 under the POCSO Act before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bidar....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...

High Court

Bombay High Court Answers Sales Tax Reference in Favor of Dealer, Allowing Resale Deduction Under Section 8(2) of Bombay Sales Tax Act Despite Purchases from Exempted Dealers. Court Holds That Exemption Conditions in Entry 39(a) Schedule A Do Not Estop Purchasing Dealer from Claiming Independent Statutory Deduction.

28 Apr 2017

The matter arose from a sales tax assessment of a proprietary concern engaged in reselling footwears, who was not a manufacturer and held no trademark...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Limitation and Maintainability Under Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose When Municipal Authorities First Demanded Higher Charges, Not Continuing, and Not Maintainable as Appellant Not a Consumer Under Section 2(1)(d) for Property Tax and Water Services Provided by Municipal Authorities.

11 Jan 2022

The appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 3 December 2018, which dismissed a consumer complai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium on Alleged Construction Delay. Court Examines Whether Demand is Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 Given Delays Attributed to the Authority.

8 Apr 2026

The present writ petition was filed by Shree Naman Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of Shree Naman Developers Ltd., against the Mumbai Metropolitan Regi...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)