Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

765 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 765 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Entitlement to Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Claimants Failed to Establish Title or Possession Over Acquired Land, and Their Challenge Was Barred by Delay and Laches.

4 Aug 2006

The petitioners, Bansrajidevi and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12/6/1986 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Made on Last Day of Two-Year Period from Section 6 Declaration Held Valid. Publication of Section 6 Declaration in Two Newspapers on Same Day as Gazette Notification Constitutes Substantial Compliance.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Govind Tukaram Shete and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Kunbi Caste Certificate for Minor Petitioner — Committee Failed to Consider Favorable Vigilance Report and Breached Principles of Natural Justice.

19 Jan 2010

The petitioner, a minor student, claimed to belong to the Kunbi caste, recognized as OBC in Maharashtra. The Deputy Collector issued a caste certifica...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate for Violation of Natural Justice. Caste Verification Committee and Appellate Authority failed to provide hearing and relied on irrelevant material, rendering cancellation orders unsustainable.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Prabhu Ramesh Haveri, was issued a caste certificate certifying him as belonging to the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category. Subsequently, t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakar Tribe Claim — Non-Compliance with Supreme Court Remand Directions. Committee Failed to Consider All Documents as Directed, Rendering Impugned Order Unsustainable and Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

3 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Vilas Dinkar Bhat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30/01/2020 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Procedural Irregularities in Notice Period and Meeting Conduct Render Motion Invalid. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 was not complied with, and the meeting was not conducted properly, thus quashing the no-confidence motion.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Indraraj Babulal Jaiswal and Sangitabai Laxman Shinde, were the Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch respectively of Grampanchayat Tembhurni....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Elected Gram Panchayat Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Secret Ballot Election of Sarpanch Upheld Under Rule 10(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964. Court holds that the no-confidence motion was invalid due to lack of proper notice under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Chimbli, challenged the election of Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch conducted on 24.02.2021 and a subs...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

1 Apr 2026

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

22 Jul 2010

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Land Grant Cancellation Case — Appellants' Rights Restored as Respondents Failed to Prove Fraud. The Court held that cancellation of grant under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires proof of fraud or misrepresentation, and mere pendency of civil suit does not justify cancellation.

8 Jan 2014

The appellants, legal heirs of late K.M. Gopalappa, were granted land by the Assistant Commissioner, Shimoga Sub-Division, under the Karnataka Land Re...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)