Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakar Tribe Claim — Non-Compliance with Supreme Court Remand Directions. Committee Failed to Consider All Documents as Directed, Rendering Impugned Order Unsustainable and Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vilas Dinkar Bhat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30/01/2020 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division, which rejected his claim of belonging to the Thakar tribe (Scheduled Tribe). The petitioner sought a declaration that he belongs to the Thakar tribe. The petitioner's grandfather, Balbhim Sakharam Thakar, originally resided in village Chibhale, Taluka Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar, but left in 1923-24 due to a plague epidemic and shifted to village Magarwadi, Taluka Pandharpur, District Solapur, where the family continued to reside. The petitioner was appointed as Talathi in 1980 against an open category post, but his claim was referred to the Committee for verification to obtain reservation benefits for promotion. The Committee invalidated his claim on 26/10/1995. The petitioner challenged this order in Writ Petition No.7518 of 2002, which was rejected on 12/07/2004, and a Review Petition was dismissed on 11/12/2006. The petitioner then filed Civil Appeal No.2095 of 2007 before the Supreme Court, which set aside the Committee's order and the High Court's orders and remanded the matter to the Committee for fresh disposal within six months, specifically observing that the Committee had not considered all documents relied upon by the petitioner. On remand, the Committee again invalidated the claim by the impugned order. The petitioner argued that the Committee failed to comply with the Supreme Court's directions and did not consider all documents. The State's counsel argued that the Committee had considered all documents and the order was proper. The High Court examined the impugned order and found that the Committee had not considered all documents, particularly the old documents from 1923-24 and other records, and had not followed the Supreme Court's directions. The Court held that the impugned order was unsustainable and set it aside, remanding the matter to the Committee for fresh consideration within three months, directing the Committee to consider all documents and follow the Supreme Court's observations.

Headnote

A) Caste Scrutiny - Scheduled Tribe Claim - Thakar Tribe - Non-Compliance with Remand Directions - The Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division, invalidated the petitioner's claim of belonging to Thakar tribe. The Supreme Court had remanded the matter directing the Committee to consider all documents relied upon by the petitioner. The Committee failed to comply with these directions and did not consider all documents. Held that the impugned order is unsustainable and set aside, matter remanded for fresh consideration within three months (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's Thakar tribe claim is sustainable when it failed to consider all documents as directed by the Supreme Court on remand.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 30/01/2020 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division, is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the Committee for fresh consideration within three months from the date of the order. The Committee is directed to consider all documents on which the petitioner relies and to follow the observations of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.2095 of 2007.

Law Points

  • Caste Scrutiny Committee must consider all documents relied upon by claimant
  • Non-compliance with Supreme Court remand directions vitiates order
  • Article 226 jurisdiction to interfere with invalid caste claim verification orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (10) 34

Writ Petition Stamp No.92627 of 2020

2020-11-03

S. C. Gupte, Madhav J. Jamdar

Mr. Girish Godbole i/b Mr. S.T. Bhosale for the Petitioner, Mr. K.A. Thorat AGP for the Respondent-State

Vilas Dinkar Bhat

The State of Maharashtra, The Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, The Tahsildar, Shrigonda, The Tahsildar, Taluka Madha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's claim of belonging to Thakar tribe.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Committee's order dated 30/01/2020 and a declaration that he belongs to Thakar tribe (Scheduled Tribe).

Filing Reason

The Committee failed to consider all documents as directed by the Supreme Court on remand, leading to an unsustainable order invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim.

Previous Decisions

The Committee initially invalidated the claim on 26/10/1995, upheld by the High Court on 12/07/2004 and Review Petition dismissed on 11/12/2006. The Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.2095 of 2007 set aside these orders and remanded the matter to the Committee for fresh disposal within six months, directing consideration of all documents.

Issues

Whether the impugned order of the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee is sustainable when it failed to consider all documents as directed by the Supreme Court on remand.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the Committee did not comply with the Supreme Court's directions and failed to consider all documents relied upon by the petitioner. Respondent's AGP argued that the Committee had considered all documents and the order was proper.

Ratio Decidendi

A caste scrutiny committee must comply with remand directions from the Supreme Court and consider all documents relied upon by the claimant. Failure to do so renders the order unsustainable and liable to be set aside under Article 226.

Judgment Excerpts

The Hon’ble Supreme Court has specifically observed that although the Committee has considered some documents, however, all the documents on which the Petitioner had placed reliance were not considered. The Committee by the impugned order again invalidated the claim of the Petitioner. The impugned order is unsustainable and is required to be set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner's caste claim was invalidated by the Committee on 26/10/1995. The petitioner challenged this in Writ Petition No.7518 of 2002, which was rejected on 12/07/2004, and a Review Petition was dismissed on 11/12/2006. The petitioner then filed Civil Appeal No.2095 of 2007 before the Supreme Court, which set aside the orders and remanded the matter to the Committee for fresh disposal within six months. The Committee passed the impugned order on 30/01/2020, again invalidating the claim. The petitioner filed the present writ petition on an unspecified date.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakar Tribe Claim — Non-Compliance with Supreme Court Remand Directions. Committee Failed to Consider All Documents as Directed, Rendering Impugned Order Unsustainable and Matter Rema...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Minor Daughter's Custody - Father's Misrepresentation Leads to Order for Production of Child. The court held that custody obtained by misrepresentation is illegal and directed the father to produ...