Search Results for "Maharashtra rules"

8924 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8924 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Service Protection Claims in Caste Invalidation Cases After Supreme Court Overrules Full Bench Decision. Supreme Court in FCI v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira Overrules Arun Sonone, Potentially Denying Protection to Petitioners Whose Scheduled Tribe Certificates Were Invalidated.

The judgment arose from a batch of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, wherein petitioners sought protection in service a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Overriding Effect of Legal Metrology Act over Insecticides Act in Labeling Dispute. Insecticides Act, 1968 being a special Act prevails over Legal Metrology Act, 2009 for labeling of insecticides.

The petitioner, Dhanuka Agritech Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in manufacturing and marketing crop protect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rajasthan High Court's Decision to Fix Minimum Cut-Off Marks After Examination in Translator Recruitment. Fixing 75% Cut-Off After Examination Held Impermissible as It Alters Selection Procedure Mid-Process Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The case arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Rajasthan High Court in 2009 for 13 posts of Translators. The applicable rules, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...