Search Results for "Hindu family partition"

668 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 668 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Order Allowing Amendment in Final Decree Proceedings to Include Property Not Part of Original Suit — Amendment Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Not Permissible After Decree Has Attained Finality.

The petitioner, the 2nd defendant in a partition suit, challenged the trial court's order allowing an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Adjudicates Regular First Appeal and Cross Objection Against Trial Court's Partial Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court Addresses Maintainability, Adoption Validity, and Ancestral Property Claims.

The Regular First Appeal and Cross Objection arose from a judgment and decree of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bagalkot, in O.S. No.57/2010, a sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Property Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as the court found no error in the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010 regarding share fixation.

The review petition was filed by the petitioners (legal representatives of the deceased original plaintiff) against the judgment dated 7.9.2012 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Orders of Surplus Land Determination Under Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955. Partition Deed Dated September 6, 1956, Not Affected by Section 32-KK as Amendment Came into Force on October 30, 1956, Not Retroactively.

The case concerned a dispute over the determination of surplus agricultural land under the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955. The appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Will and Possession. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse.

The appellant, original defendant Jayawant (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court's Partial Decree for Declaration, Injunction, and Partition. Appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and trial court's findings were based on proper appreciation of evidence under Section 96 CPC.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2...