Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prosecution Against Accused in Customs Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Petitioner, a Dubai-based Indian, was prosecuted for alleged smuggling of gold bars without prior sanction under Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962, rendering the complaint invalid.

The petitioner, Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed, was Accused No.2 in CC No.210/2014 pending before the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Dakshina Kannada, Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction. Multiple SCNs issued beyond normal period of limitation without proper justification under proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 are invalid.

The petitioner, ATA Freight Line (I) Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in freight forwarding and logistics services, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Recovery Case — Customs Authorities Cannot Recover Duty Dehors Sections 28 and 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Duty on Confiscated Goods Not Recoverable When Redemption Option Not Exercised.

The Bombay High Court, in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, considered two substantial questions of law: whether customs authoriti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Order-in-Original for Defying Advance Ruling on Betel Nut Classification. Authority for Advance Rulings' classification of betel nut products under CTH 2106 90 30 is binding on Customs authorities under Section 28J of the Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Isha Exim, a business engaged in importing edible products including processed betel nut (supari), challenged an Order-in-Original dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...