KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
Search Results for "section 202 inquiry"
679 result(s) found
Found 679 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Settlement Reached Under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Leads to Quashing of FIR and Criminal Revision.
3 Aug 2006The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused persons (husband and his relatives) against the order of the Sessions Court ref...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.
10 Mar 2017The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...
- 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...
- 67
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.
1 Sep 2020The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...
- 459
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.
9 Mar 2026The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
1 Aug 2026The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...
- 81
High Court
- 66
Supreme Court
"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."
5 Nov 2024The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...
- 765
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Petitions for Enforcement and Setting Aside of Foreign Arbitration Award — Partial Award on Jurisdiction Upheld; Challenge under Section 34 Considered Inappropriate for Foreign Award. Enforcement of Award under Sections 44-49 Proceeded While Section 34 Petition Found Not Maintainable Against a Foreign Award Governed by English Law.
9 May 2014The dispute arose from an agency agreement between Perma Container (UK) Line Limited (claimant), a UK company, and Perma Container Line (India) Pvt. L...
- 15
