KAHC010068412019_1
16 Aug 2019...
Search Results for "legal proposition"
5123 result(s) found
Found 5123 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.
11 Aug 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.
28 Aug 2017The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Appeals Against Conviction and Acquittal in Kidnapping and Murder Case Under Indian Penal Code — Key reason: The appeals challenge the trial court's reliance on circumstantial evidence and the application of the last seen theory. The Court examined sufficiency of evidence under Sections 363, 302, 120B, 201 IPC and Section 27 of Evidence Act, and the State sought enhancement of sentence to capital punishment for the murder of a minor.
16 Apr 2019The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard four criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Akot, dated 1 June 2016, in Sessions...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Selected Candidate for Appointment as Driver in MSRTC, Quashes Rejection on Ground of Suppression of Criminal Antecedents. Court holds that non-disclosure of past acquittal in a criminal case does not amount to suppression of material facts when the candidate was not convicted and the acquittal was based on compromise.
11 Oct 2017The petitioner, Suresh s/o Bhujangrao Ingole, was a selected candidate for the post of Driver in the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSR...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Catering Policy 2005 for Railway Minor Units. Petitioners Seek to Quash Policy and Extend Existing Licences Under Catering Policy 2000.
12 Apr 2006The petitions involved a challenge to the Catering Policy 2005 introduced by the Indian Railways for minor catering units at railway stations across v...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Partnership Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Strong Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief. Court held that disputes regarding partnership accounts and alleged mismanagement must be resolved through arbitration, not by appointing receiver at interim stage.
22 Aug 2014The petitioner, Minochar @ Minoo Aspandyar Irani, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award. Dispute Related to Charter Hire Agreement for Offshore Drilling, Involving Claims for Lost Equipment, Day Rates, and Demobilisation Fees.
20 Dec 2014The Bombay High Court considered an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt...
- 14
High Court
Divison Bench of Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Admiralty Appeal on Quantum of Security for Release of Arrested Vessel M.V. Nordlake; Order of Single Judge Requiring Full-Claim Security Challenged. The appellant foreign ship-owner contended that under the International Convention on Arrest of Ships, 1999 and Rule 954 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, security should be limited to the vessel's value of Rs.47 crores, while the respondent Union of India argued that security must cover the full claim of Rs.1058 crores.
7 Mar 2012The appeal arose from collision between the first defendant vessel, M.V. Nordlake, and the naval vessel INS Vindhyagiri near Mumbai on 30 January 2011...
