Search Results for "duty paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "duty paid"

6734 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6734 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claims for Export of Yarn — Revisional Authority's Order Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 35-EE of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the revisional authority has the power to condone delay in filing revision application, and the High Court will not interfere with such discretionary order under Article 226.

3 May 2006

The petitioners, the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Reassessment Orders in Sale Deed Dispute — Valuation Based on Guideline Value Without Proper Opportunity Held Invalid. Court sets aside orders passed under Section 45A of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and lack of proper enquiry.

15 Jul 2022

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner in W.P.No.10535/2012 is Dodballapur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

31 Jan 2024

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Impound Documents in Bank Recovery Suit — Stamp Duty Objection Must Be Raised at Time of Marking. Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 does not mandate impounding after documents are marked without objection; belated application cannot compel court to impound.

7 Mar 2014

The petitioner, defendant No.1 in a suit filed by Vijaya Bank for recovery of money, challenged the trial court's order dated 19.04.2012 declining to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Insufficiently Stamped Document Admitted in Evidence — Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Can Be Invoked. The court held that admission of a document without considering its stamp duty can be recalled to prevent abuse of process, and Section 35 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 does not bar such recall.

9 Jul 2024

The case involves a civil appeal arising from a dispute over two sale deeds concerning the same property. The appellant and the respondent each claime...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.19366 OF 2024

9 Apr 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Deliberates Whether Manager of Cooperative Bank Is Public Servant under Prevention of Corruption Act; Employee of Cooperative Bank Under Liquidation Challenges Dismissal of Discharge Application. The Court Examines the Scope of 'Public Servant' Under Section 2(c) in Light of Arguments That Cooperative Bank Not Aided or Controlled by Government.

6 May 2013

...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)