Search Results for "directory rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "directory rules"

556 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 556 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Acquisition for Mumbai Metro Project — Procedural Compliance Under Section 11(1) of Metro Railways Act Upheld. The court held that the requirement of hearing before acquisition is directory and substantial compliance by public notice suffices for a public purpose project.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for the Mumbai Metro Rail Project un...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals of Occupants Challenging Eviction from Comunidade Land — Appellants Failed to Prove Title or Authorisation, Eviction Upheld Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC and Section 38 Specific Relief Act, 1963.

1 Nov 2023

The case involves five first appeals filed by Ayub Khan, Khurshida Ahmad, Salim Sandhi, Mehmood A. Ansari, and Dadapir Lohar against the State of Goa,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Appeal in Service Termination Case — Resignation Not Proved as Involuntary or Procedurally Invalid Under MEPS Act, 1977. The court held that even if provisions of Section 7 and Rule 40 are directory, substantial compliance must be shown, but the appellant failed to demonstrate that his resignation was not voluntary or that the management's acceptance was improper.

2 Nov 2017

The appellant, Tukaram s/o Tulsiram Nakhate, was employed as a teacher in a granted school run by Pragatishil Shikshan Sanstha since 1991. He claimed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendants to File Written Statement in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession — Delay Condoned Due to Lack of Notice and Sufficient Cause. The court held that the trial court ought to have taken a liberal view and condoned the delay in filing the written statement under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, as the defendants had a right to contest the suit on merits and the delay was not intentional.

11 Jan 2018

The petitioners, who were defendants in O.S.No.6525/2012 before the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, filed writ petitions under Art...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes NCLT Order for Violation of Rule 89 of NCLT Rules, 2016 — Lack of Proper Notice for Pronouncement of Judgment. Failure to Upload Cause List in Advance and Sudden Pronouncement Without Intimation to Parties Constitutes Breach of Natural Justice.

17 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Umang Haribhai Thakkar and others, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging the judgment dated 09.02.2026 pass...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Quashing of Vice-Chancellor Appointment for Non-compliance with UGC Eligibility Norms. Vice-Chancellor's Associate Professor Experience in Private College Held Insufficient Under UGC Regulations, 2010.

1 Aug 2026

These civil appeals were filed before the Supreme Court against a common judgment of the Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) dated 26 June 2014, which a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

6 Apr 2010

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Reduction of Pension for Bank Employee Under Central Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995. Prior Consultation with Board of Directors Mandatory Before Reducing Pension Below Full Admissible Amount Under Regulation 33.

26 Jul 2026

The dispute arose from the compulsory retirement of an employee of the Central Bank of India, who had served as Chief Manager, a scale IV officer. Dur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order and Remands Dispute in No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Proper service of notice on all panchayat members is mandatory, and disputed duty of service necessitated fresh inquiry to determine if actual or alternate service was effected as per Bombay Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Upasarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

23 Sep 2016

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Upa-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Belgaon Tarale, Taluka Igatpuri, District Nashik. The ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)