Search Results for "RTO record"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Corruption Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Must Be Granted by Competent Authority Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 23.08.2017 passed by the LXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging PMLA Attachment Orders for Non-Prosecution. Petitioners failed to appear or file written submissions despite multiple adjournments, leading to dismissal for default.

The petitioners, Krishna Shantaram Chamankar, Prasanna Shantaram Chamankar, and K.S. Chamankar Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Habeas Corpus Petition by Claimed Adoptive Parents Seeking Custody of Minor Child. Court Examines Whether Adoption Deed is Valid Under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 and Whether Child is in Need of Care and Protection Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.

The petition was filed by a married couple claiming to have adopted a girl-child from her biological mother, who had expressed unwillingness to care f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Forcible Dispossession. Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Forcible Ouster by Defendant with Armed Men, Entitling Him to Summary Remedy Without Proof of Title.

The plaintiff, Om Nath Chudamani Sharma, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of Flat No. ...