High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The specific outcome and legal findings are not disclosed in the provided judgment excerpt.
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Bombay Public Trusts Act"
529 result(s) found
Found 529 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Corporation to Follow 2013 Act for Land Acquisition When Owner Refuses TDR. Land Reserved for Public Purpose Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Acquired by Compelling TDR; Authority Must Initiate Acquisition Under 2013 Act if Owner Refuses TDR.
1 Jan 2024The petitioner, a Public Charitable Trust, owned land bearing CTS No.216(pt) and CTS No.190 in Village Mandapeshwar, Borivali, Mumbai. The land was re...
- 479
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Musical Fountain and Viewer's Gallery at Futala Tank, Holding Lake Not a Declared Wetland Under Wetlands Rules. Court directs compliance with environmental safeguards and prohibits permanent construction within the lake body.
30 Nov 2023The present proceedings were filed as a Public Interest Litigation by Swacch Association, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1...
- 27
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.
1 Oct 2019The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...
- 367
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Suspension of Municipal Resolution Allotting Land to Trust for Youth Centre — Lack of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. The Collector's order under Section 308 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 suspending a resolution allotting land to a trust was set aside for violation of principles of natural justice as the trust was not heard before the order.
7 Sep 2017The petitioner, Prabhodhan Sanstha, a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the Societies Registration ...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Withdrawal of Suit Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act. Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Upheld as No New Trust Was Created and Suit Was Not Maintainable.
6 Apr 2016The petitioner, Prabhakar Waktuji Sapate, filed three writ petitions challenging the order dated 21.1.2016 passed by the learned Joint Charity Commiss...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.
23 Dec 2015The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit by Trust — Notice of Termination Held Invalid for Non-Compliance with Section 36(2) of Bombay Tenancy Act. Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Under Section 38 of the Act Not Extinguished Due to Invalid Notice.
23 Nov 2015The respondent, Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, owned agricultural land measuring 28 acre...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Property Alienation Under Section 36(1) of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 — Joint Charity Commissioner's Rejection Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the Commissioner must consider all evidence and cannot reject an application without proper reasoning.
30 Jun 2010The petitioner, Terna Public Charitable Trust, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Latur. The first order d...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Dated 2004 Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity or Deposit Balance Consideration.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a First Appeal filed by the original defendants against the decree of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15.04.2004....
- 43
