High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The specific outcome and legal findings are not disclosed in the provided judgment excerpt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.1811 OF 2019

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 149

Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019

2025-04-15

Amit Borkar

2025:BHC-AS:16971

Sunil G. Karandikar (Amicus Curiae), Vijay Killedar, Mrs. M.S. Srivastava, Nikhil N. Wadikar, Kastur Patil, Rushikesh Desai, Samata More, Nandu Pawar

Suvarna Appasaheb Kshirsagar & Others

The State of Maharashtra & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Judgment Excerpts

By the present Writ Petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Will Propounded by Original Defendant in Property Inheritance Suit; High Court's Reappraisal of Evidence in Second Appeal Set Aside. Execution of Will by Deceased Testatrix in Favour of Appellant Proved by Attesting Witnesses, N...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Material Considered in Original Scrutiny Assessment is Invalid.