Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "trial court order"
20478 result(s) found
Found 20478 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.
17 Dec 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.
17 Oct 2018These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...
- 74
High Court
High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.
17 Feb 2016The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...
- 74
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant in Writ Appeal Seeking Removal of Special Public Prosecutor in Disproportionate Assets Appeals. Engagement of Special Public Prosecutor by Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, a Party to the Appeals, Held Not to Suffer from Conflict of Interest or Bias under Section 24(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
11 Feb 2015Background: The case arose from appeals against conviction in a high-profile disproportionate assets case involving a former Chief Minister of Tamil N...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability Objection Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Petition Challenging Arbitral Award. Preliminary Objection Centers on Whether Prior Section 9 Application in Baroda Court and Lack of Cause of Action Oust High Court's Jurisdiction to Entertain Section 34 Petition.
5 Jun 2006The petitioner, Ion Exchange (India) Ltd., challenged an arbitral award directing it to pay certain amounts to the respondent, Paramount Limited, by f...
- 35
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...
- 80
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in Malegaon Bomb Blast Case. Accused Charged Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Other Serious Offences Seeks Release Pending Trial.
25 Apr 2017The appeal arose from the rejection of a bail application by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and the Nati...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and its judgment was perverse and not based on evidence.
16 Jul 2026The case involves a property dispute among siblings over ancestral property in Campal, Panaji, Goa. The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit...
- 63
