Search Results for "redevelopment permission"

435 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sale of Trust Property by Board of Trustees. Court holds that sale sanctioned by court under Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 cannot be challenged by beneficiaries who were not parties to the original proceedings.

The present petition was filed by S.S. Mhatre and others seeking recall and setting aside of an order dated 11.1.1994 passed in Misc. Petition No. 43 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Arrears of Rent — Slum Area Declaration Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Without Prior Permission Under Section 22 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

The petitioner, Hari Dhondu Gurav, was a monthly tenant in a room in Clement D'Souza Chawl, Mumbai, owned by the respondent, Jhonney Augustine Gomes. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition, Restores Eviction Orders Against Tenants for Subletting Under Section 105-B of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Tenants failed to prove lawful occupation of alleged subtenants, burden of proof not discharged.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition challenging a common judgment and order dated 31st December 2008 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.

A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...