Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sale of Trust Property by Board of Trustees. Court holds that sale sanctioned by court under Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 cannot be challenged by beneficiaries who were not parties to the original proceedings.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 135
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present petition was filed by S.S. Mhatre and others seeking recall and setting aside of an order dated 11.1.1994 passed in Misc. Petition No. 43 of 1993, which sanctioned the sale of trust property by the Board of Trustees to the original respondent no. 10. The petitioners also sought a declaration that the agreement for sale dated 14.2.1994 be declared null and void, and pending hearing, an injunction restraining the respondents from implementing the agreement. The background facts reveal that on 6.11.1930, a scheme was propounded before the Bombay High Court in respect of Worli Gupchar & Bhoeye Sansthan Trust, which provided that all assets and properties vest in the Official Trustee appointed by the State Government, with Malaks appointed on the Board of Trustees for management. On 18.3.1935, a lease was granted by the Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay for a plot of land for 999 years, and buildings were constructed and let out to tenants belonging to the Pathare Kshatriya Caste community. The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 came into force in 1950, and the scheme is governed by its provisions. A proposal for redevelopment of the trust property was formulated, and on 20.10.1992, a proposal was submitted by the Board of Trustees to the court for sanction of sale. The court sanctioned the sale on 11.1.1994, and an agreement for sale was executed on 14.2.1994. The petitioners, claiming to be beneficiaries of the trust, filed the present petition in 1996 seeking to challenge the sale. The court held that the petition was not maintainable as the petitioners were not parties to the original proceedings and had not shown any sufficient cause for the delay. The court also noted that the sale was validly sanctioned under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and that the petitioners had no locus standi to challenge the order after such a long period. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Trust Law - Scheme of Trust - Vesting of Property - Under a scheme propounded in 1930, all assets and properties of Worli Gupchar & Bhoeye Sansthan Trust vest in the Official Trustee appointed by the State Government, with Malaks appointed on the Board of Trustees for management (Paras 2-3).

B) Trust Law - Sale of Trust Property - Sanction of Court - The Board of Trustees sought and obtained sanction of the court under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 for sale of trust property. The court held that the sale was validly sanctioned and the petitioners, who were not parties to the original proceedings, cannot challenge the order after a long delay (Paras 4-6).

C) Civil Procedure - Recall of Order - Maintainability - A petition seeking recall of an order sanctioning sale of trust property is not maintainable when filed by persons who were not parties to the original proceedings and who have not shown any sufficient cause for the delay (Paras 7-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 11.1.1994 sanctioning the sale of trust property can be recalled and set aside, and whether the agreement for sale dated 14.2.1994 is null and void.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Scheme of trust
  • vesting of property in Official Trustee
  • sale of trust property
  • sanction of court
  • recall of order
  • Bombay Public Trusts Act
  • 1950
  • limitation
  • maintainability of petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 155

MISC. PETITION NO. 11 OF 1996

2005-04-06

S.U. Kamdar, J.

Mr. A.Y. Sakhare with B.B. Saraf with Y. Chaudhari i/by Prakash & Co. for petitioners; Mr. R. Subramanian with Mr. A.Sayed and A. Pujari i/by M/s. Dhru & Co. for Respondent Nos. 10(a) to 10(e); Ms. A.B. Kapadia i/by Daphtary Farreira & Diwan for Respondent nos. 4 to 7; Mr. P.G. Lad for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2; Mr. L.V. Govilkar for Respondent No. 3.

S.S. Mhatre & others

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition seeking recall of order sanctioning sale of trust property and declaration that agreement for sale is null and void.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought recall and setting aside of order dated 11.1.1994 sanctioning sale, declaration that agreement for sale dated 14.2.1994 is null and void, and injunction restraining implementation of the agreement.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed that the sale of trust property was not validly sanctioned and that they were beneficiaries of the trust.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 11.1.1994 in Misc. Petition No. 43 of 1993 sanctioning the sale of property by the Board of Trustees to original respondent no. 10.

Issues

Whether the order dated 11.1.1994 sanctioning sale of trust property can be recalled and set aside. Whether the agreement for sale dated 14.2.1994 is null and void. Whether the petitioners have locus standi to challenge the sale after delay.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the sale was not validly sanctioned and that they were beneficiaries of the trust. Respondents argued that the sale was validly sanctioned under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and that the petitioners were not parties to the original proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

A petition seeking recall of an order sanctioning sale of trust property is not maintainable when filed by persons who were not parties to the original proceedings and who have not shown any sufficient cause for the delay. The sale was validly sanctioned under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition is filed inter alia seeking relief that the order dated 11.1.1994 passed in Misc. Petition No. 43 of 1993 sanctioning the sale of the property by the Board of Trustees to the original respondent no. 10 be recalled and set aside. On 6.11.1930 a scheme was propounded before this Court in respect of Worli Gupchar & Bhoeye Sansthan Trust. The Bombay Public Trust Act came into force in 1950.

Procedural History

On 6.11.1930, a scheme was propounded before the Bombay High Court for Worli Gupchar & Bhoeye Sansthan Trust. On 18.3.1935, a lease was granted by the Municipal Corporation. On 20.10.1992, a proposal for redevelopment was submitted. On 11.1.1994, the court sanctioned the sale in Misc. Petition No. 43 of 1993. On 14.2.1994, an agreement for sale was executed. On 1996, the present petition was filed seeking recall of the order and declaration that the agreement is null and void.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Land Possession Dispute Under Section 33B of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlords' Certificate of Exemption Under Section 88C Upheld, Personal Cultivation Need Established.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — School Leaving Certificate Not Properly Proved Under Section 35 Evidence Act. Release Deed Executed by Major Plaintiff Valid Despite Absence of Fraud or Coercion.