Search Results for "re-development agreement"

522 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 522 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notification for Petitioners' Land Due to Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Notification held invalid for failing to specify the particular land and for not providing opportunity of hearing before declaration of slum area.

The petitioners, Yogesh Chandulal Mehta and Suresh Chandulal Mehta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Acquisition Notification Under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slums Act. Property Vests in Government Upon Final Notification; Owner's Remedy is Compensation, Not Challenge to Acquisition.

The petitioners, Marathwada Society Chawl Committee and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Gov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Building Declared Dilapidated — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Procedure Under MMC Act Before Demolition. Tenants' Right to Hearing Upheld Under Sections 354 and 488 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioners, eleven tenants residing in a building called Habib Terrace in Kurla, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Redevelopment Agreement — Limitation Period Not to Defeat Substantive Right. Continuing Cause of Action Recognized Where Parties Were in Ongoing Negotiations and Escrow Agent Released Flats Only in December 2018.

The appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by tenants (appellants) against a partnership firm (respondents) concerning a redevelopment project ...