Search Results for "notice under Section 32(2)"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Teachers for Release of Withheld Salary — Non-Payment of Salary Without Justification Violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Court Directs Respondents to Release Salary Within Six Weeks.

The petitioners, four teachers employed at Shri. Deshbhushan High School, Kothali Kuppanwadi, Chikkodi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions Challenging School Tribunal's Order Quashing Termination of Teacher. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Earlier Enquiries Are Quashed for Non-Compliance of Rules 36/37 of MEPS Rules, 1981 Are Impermissible.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of the educational institution, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions in Teacher Termination Case. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Quashing for Non-Compliance of MEPS Rules 36 and 37 Are Not Permissible.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of an educational institution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Lack of Bona Fides and Substantial Defence. Company's claim of disputed debt and pending civil suit found to be a bona fide defence against winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Joshi Bullion Gems & Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 again...