High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Teachers for Release of Withheld Salary — Non-Payment of Salary Without Justification Violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Court Directs Respondents to Release Salary Within Six Weeks.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 152
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, four teachers employed at Shri. Deshbhushan High School, Kothali Kuppanwadi, Chikkodi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release their monthly salary from May 2024 onwards, which was allegedly withheld without any justification. The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers and a Physical Education Teacher in the school, which is a private aided institution. The respondents included the State of Karnataka, the Additional Commissioner of Education, the Deputy Director of Public Instructions, the Block Educational Officer, and the school represented by its Head Master. The petitioners contended that despite rendering service, their salaries were not paid from May 2024, causing financial hardship and violating their fundamental right to livelihood under Article 21. The respondents, represented by the High Court Government Pleader and the school's advocate, did not file detailed objections but opposed the petition. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the withholding of salary without any legal justification is arbitrary and violative of Article 21. The court noted that the petitioners had been working and were entitled to salary for the work done. The court directed the respondents to release the withheld salary within six weeks from the date of the order. The petition was disposed of with the above direction.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Salary - Withholding of Salary - Right to Livelihood - Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Petitioners, teachers in a private aided school, sought mandamus for release of salary withheld from May 2024 onwards - Court held that salary is a fundamental right under Article 21 and its withholding without justification is arbitrary - Directed respondents to release salary within six weeks (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents can withhold the monthly salary of the petitioners without any justification and whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of mandamus for release of salary.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to release the withheld salary of the petitioners from May 2024 onwards within six weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Right to salary is a fundamental right under Article 21
  • Writ of Mandamus lies for enforcement of salary claims
  • Non-payment of salary without authority is arbitrary and violative of Article 14
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15969

WP No. 104367 of 2025 (S-RES)

2025-11-20

M. Nagaprasanna

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15969

Smt. Vaibhavi Inamadar (for petitioners), Smt. Girija S. Hiremath (HCGP for R1 to R4), Sri. Kishor S. Sutar (for R5)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus for release of withheld salary.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to release their monthly salary from May 2024 onwards.

Filing Reason

Salary of petitioners was withheld without justification from May 2024.

Issues

Whether the respondents can withhold the salary of the petitioners without any justification. Whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of mandamus for release of salary.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they have been working and their salary is being withheld without any justification, violating their fundamental right under Article 21. Respondents opposed the petition but did not provide detailed objections.

Ratio Decidendi

Salary is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and its withholding without any legal justification is arbitrary and violative of Article 14. A writ of mandamus lies to enforce the right to salary.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer: 'Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus... by directing the respondents... to pass necessary order by releasing the monthly salary of the petitioner from the month of May 2024 to till this month which is wrongly withheld by them.' The court held that withholding salary without justification is arbitrary and violative of Article 21.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date and came up for preliminary hearing B Group on 20th November 2025, when the court passed the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 21, 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Teachers for Release of Withheld Salary — Non-Payment of Salary Without Justification Violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Court Directs Respondents to Release Salary Within Six Weeks.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Affirms State of Maharashtra v. Milind and Others Judgment, Rejects Claims Based on Invalid Caste Certificates. Clarifies States' Lack of Authority to Alter SC/ST Lists; Upholds Dismissal of Employees Appointed Based on Invalid Certif...