Search Results for "maximum compensation"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.

The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Illegal Handcuffing and Parading in a Bailable Offence. The Court Deliberates on Police Conduct and Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 in Context of Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, a law student, faced five criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, arising from dishonoured cheq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MMRDA's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Powai Land Development Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's interpretation of tripartite agreement regarding lease premium and development charges under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an arbitration petition filed by Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) and the State of Maharashtra under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...