Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

630 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 630 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 Not Lapsed Despite Non-Completion of Scheme. Possession Taken and Award Passed, No Abandonment or Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

The appellant, Sri M. Rajappa, filed a writ appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging an order dated 16.12.2024 passed by a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Kilambakkam Sky Walk Project; Holds District Gazette Publication Valid Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. District Collector's Dual Role as Collector and Appropriate Government Upheld, and Writ Maintainable Despite Passing of Award.

The petitioners, owners of land in Kilambakkam Village, Chengelpet District, challenged the acquisition of their property for the construction of a sk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 as Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Compensation or Challenge Proceedings After Section 4 Notification.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the State of Haryana appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisition lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Lucknow Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Possession Taken Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2). Twin Conditions of Non-Possession and Non-Payment Must Be Satisfied for Lapse; Possession Taken in 2003 Vests Land in State.

The case involves an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 03.07.2017, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Notifications Issued in 2005 Filed in 2019 Held Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Sri B R Srinivas, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.

The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...