Search Results for "Rule 222"

660 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 660 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Arrears of Rent and Bonafide Requirement Not Proven. Tenant's Deposit of Standard Rent and Continued Business Use Defeated Claims Under Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioner, Trilokchand Shantilal Badjate, as landlord, filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Malegaon seeking eviction of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Railways Act Case Due to Lack of Mens Rea. Tractor-trailer crossing railway track without permission does not constitute offense under Section 161 of Railways Act, 1989 as it requires intention to cause damage or obstruction.

The petitioner, Hanumanthanayak, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Holenarsipur, in C.C. No. 3/07 for an offense under Section 161...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 452, 354, 323, 506(2) read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 222 of 1994 for offen...