Search Results for "Maharashtra Relief Undertakings"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Power Generator Against Termination of PPA — Holds That Failure to Secure Fuel Supply Agreement Does Not Justify Termination Where PPA Does Not Condition Power Supply on Specific Coal Source

The case involves a dispute between M/s Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd. (appellant) and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and others (respondents), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Bank Employee's Petition Against Unilateral Withholding of Pension. Pension is a property right and cannot be stopped without show cause notice or disciplinary proceedings under Bank of Maharashtra Pension Regulations.

The petitioner, Devanand s/o Galomal Nichwani, was a computer operator/clerk at Bank of Maharashtra, Jaripatka Branch, Nagpur. He opted for voluntary ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Medical College to Increase MBBS Seats from 100 to 150 for 4th Batch. Medical Council of India's Objection Based on Affiliation to Deemed University Rejected as Arbitrary Under Section 10(c) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Mahatma Gandhi Mission's Medical College, established in 1989 with permission for 100 MBBS students, sought renewal of permission for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Inspection Order Under Section 28 of Maharashtra Rent Act. Landlord's Application for Measurement of Tenanted Premises Allowed to Ascertain Area for Reconstruction Undertaking Under Section 16(6)(d).

The petitioners, tenants of suit premises, challenged an order passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court, Bombay, allowing the respondent landlord's app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...