Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

645 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 645 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Revisionary Authority on Jurisdiction Ground. Cause of Action Arises at Place of Revisionary Authority's Office Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Not Where Original Adjudication Order Was Passed.

The Bombay High Court dealt with a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of six writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Registration of Sale Certificate Under SARFAESI Act. Sub-Registrar Directed to Register Sale Certificate Despite Pending Civil Suit as Section 89(4) of Registration Act, 1908 Mandates Registration.

The petitioner, Sri T. Bharathgowda, purchased a property at an auction conducted by Canara Bank (respondent No.3) under the Securitisation and Recons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue to Withdraw Customs Appeals Based on CBEC Monetary Threshold Instructions. Court permits withdrawal of appeals and review of Tribunal orders under Section 35R of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 131BA of Customs Act, 1962.

The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa, filed nine Customs Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against orders of the Cust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation of Physician's Free Samples Under Central Excise Act. Free samples of medicines are excisable goods and must be valued under Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 based on price of comparable goods sold in the market.

The petitioners, Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association and M/s. Emil Pharmaceuticals Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged Circular No. 813 dated 25/4/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962. Interest on Delayed Payment of Duty Held Payable Only After Crystallization of Duty Liability by Supreme Court Decision.

The petitioner, M/s. M.J. Exports Pvt. Ltd., imported 53 Haemodialysis Machines and accessories under an Open General License and claimed exemption un...