Bombay High Court Allows Revenue to Withdraw Customs Appeals Based on CBEC Monetary Threshold Instructions. Court permits withdrawal of appeals and review of Tribunal orders under Section 35R of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 131BA of Customs Act, 1962.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa, filed nine Customs Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), West Zonal Bench, Mumbai. The appeals were admitted on 26 September 2012 on substantial questions of law and were pending final hearing. Subsequently, the appellant filed miscellaneous civil applications seeking withdrawal of the appeals and review of the Tribunal's orders, relying on instructions issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) vide F.No.390/MISC/163/2010-JC dated 17 December 2015. These instructions, issued in partial modification of earlier instructions dated 17 August 2011, directed the withdrawal of appeals involving low revenue and a review of Tribunal orders in line with a monetary threshold policy. The appellant submitted that the instructions were binding and that the appeals involved amounts below the prescribed threshold. The respondent, Sesa Goa Limited, did not oppose the applications. The Court, comprising Justices Anoop V. Mohta and Nutan D. Sardessai, allowed the applications, permitting the withdrawal of the appeals and the review of the Tribunal's orders. The Court noted that the instructions were issued under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable to Service Tax under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, and Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court disposed of all appeals and applications by a common judgment, holding that the Revenue was entitled to act upon the CBEC instructions in the public interest.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Withdrawal of Appeals - Monetary Threshold - The appellant Revenue sought withdrawal of appeals and applications based on CBEC instructions F.No.390/MISC/163/2010-JC dated 17.12.2015, which directed withdrawal of appeals involving low revenue and review of Tribunal orders. The Court permitted withdrawal, noting that the instructions were binding and the respondent had no objection. (Paras 1-5)

B) Customs Law - Review of Orders - Section 131BA Customs Act, 1962 - The appellant also sought to review the orders of the Tribunal in light of the same CBEC instructions. The Court allowed the review applications, observing that the instructions were issued in the public interest and the respondent did not oppose. (Paras 2-5)

C) Customs Law - Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35R - The CBEC instructions were issued under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, and Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that the instructions were valid and the Revenue was entitled to act upon them. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant (Revenue) should be permitted to withdraw the appeals and applications in view of the instructions issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) to withdraw appeals involving low revenue and to review the orders of the Tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the applications, permitted withdrawal of the appeals, and disposed of all appeals and applications accordingly.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeals
  • Monetary threshold for litigation
  • Review of orders
  • Instructions of Central Board of Excise and Customs
  • Section 35R Central Excise Act 1944
  • Section 131BA Customs Act 1962
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017:BHC-GOA:839-DB

Custom Appeal No. 1 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.2 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.3 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.4 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.5 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.6 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.7 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.8 of 2012 with Custom Appeal No.9 of 2012

2017-03-23

Anoop V. Mohta, Nutan D. Sardessai

2017:BHC-GOA:839-DB

Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Central Government Standing Counsel for appellant; Mr. Sarvesh Kamat Malyekar, Advocate for the respondent

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa Commissionerate

Sesa Goa Limited, Met Coke Division

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against orders of CESTAT, WZ, Mumbai.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (Revenue) sought withdrawal of the appeals and review of the Tribunal's orders based on CBEC instructions.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed appeals being aggrieved by the orders passed by CESTAT, and later sought withdrawal due to CBEC instructions to litigate only high-value cases.

Previous Decisions

The appeals were admitted on 26/09/2012 on substantial questions of law and were pending final hearing.

Issues

Whether the appellant should be permitted to withdraw the appeals and applications in view of CBEC instructions.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant submitted that in exercise of powers under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, and Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962, the CBEC issued instructions dated 17.12.2015 directing withdrawal of appeals involving low revenue and review of Tribunal orders. The appellant sought to act upon these instructions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Revenue is entitled to withdraw appeals and seek review of Tribunal orders based on binding instructions issued by the CBEC under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962, in the public interest.

Judgment Excerpts

All appeals are already admitted on 26/09/2012. All the appeals are disposed off by this common judgment as issues are common and so also the position of law. These applications are taken out by the appellant Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise for disposing off all the appeals in view of the instructions of the board so reflected in following paras:

Procedural History

The appellant filed nine Customs Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against orders of CESTAT, WZ, Mumbai. The appeals were admitted on 26 September 2012. Subsequently, the appellant filed miscellaneous civil applications seeking withdrawal of the appeals and review of the Tribunal's orders based on CBEC instructions dated 17 December 2015. The Court disposed of all appeals and applications by a common judgment on 23 March 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 130, Section 131BA
  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 35R
  • Finance Act, 1994: Section 83
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Order in Mundkar Dispute — Tribunal Exceeded Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 26 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. Concurr...
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Dismisses Appeal by Personal Guarantor Against Withdrawal of Insolvency Petition by State Bank of India — Principles of Dominus Litis and Right to Withdraw Under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 Upheld. The Personal Guarantor has no locus standi to ob...