Search Results for "rectification order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "rectification order"

919 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows BSNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertisement Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 24% Compound to 18% Simple. The court held that an arbitral award granting 24% compound interest per annum is exorbitant and contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and reduced it to 18% simple interest.

5 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a statutory body, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

High Court

Madras High Court Rehears Interlocutory Applications in Trademark Dispute for Interim Injunction. Court Directed to Apply Trinity Tests and Consider Section 12-A Compliance and Order 2 Rule 2 Bar After Remand by Division Bench.

5 Feb 2025

The Madras High Court reheard two interlocutory applications in a commercial suit involving a trademark dispute over the 'Massey Ferguson' brand. Trac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

6 May 2020

The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Execution Matter — Post-Award Interest Calculation Must Follow Hyder Consulting Principle. Court holds that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is payable on the entire sum awarded including pre-award interest, overruling S.L. Arora.

13 Dec 2024

The dispute arose from a contract awarded by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (appellant) to M/s. S.A. Builders Ltd. (respondent) in 1983 for con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Patta Validity Requires Proof of Abandonment or Revocation of Earlier Patta Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code.

9 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a land title dispute in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents-plaintiffs (Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwana...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.

25 Mar 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

31 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Opposition Case — Registration of Device Mark Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Use. The Court held that the Registrar erred in accepting user claim without proper documentary evidence, and that the appellant's prior use since 1992 was established.

15 Apr 2026

The appellant, Ganesh Consumer Products Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, against an order dated 11.09.2024 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal, Sets Aside Appellate Decree, and Remands Suit for Fresh Trial Due to Erroneous Rejection of Adjournment and Unexplained Delay in Pronouncing Judgment. Denial of Opportunity to Lead Evidence and Non-Compliance with Section 105 CPC Requirements on Challenging Interlocutory Orders Vitiate the Appellate Judgment.

20 Mar 2014

Second Appeals Nos. 340 and 356 of 1999 arose from the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Akola, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 132 of 1988, whic...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)