High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010353202008_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (03) 57

I.T.A.No.879/2008 c/w I.T.A.Nos.882/2008, 907/2008, 909/2008, 880/2008, 881/2008, 904/2008, 905/2008, 108/2009, 109/2009, 210/2009, 211/2009, 209/2009, 333/2009, 334/2009 & 363/2009

2015-03-25

N. Kumar, B. Sreenivase Gowda

Sri Venkataraman (Senior Counsel for Dr. R.B. Krishna), Sri E.R. Indrakumar (Senior Counsel for Sri K.V. Aravind and Sri E. Sanmathi)

M/s Wipro Limited; The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Bangalore; The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(3), Bangalore (in respective appeals)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(3), Bangalore; M/s Wipro Ltd., Doddakannelli, Bangalore (in respective appeals)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

Appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arising out of orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore dated 30.05.2008, 31.10.2008 and 30.01.2009, for assessment years 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2004-2005. Multiple appeals clubbed for hearing.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Indore Development Authority's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Plot Allotment After 28 Years. Respondent's Default in Payment and Laches Lead to Setting Aside of Consumer Fora Orders Directing Possession.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Anganwadi Worker's Petition Challenging Termination Without Enquiry - Violation of Natural Justice Leads to Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination Order Quashed as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given Before Terminat...