Search Results for "duty paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "duty paid"

6732 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6732 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Benefit of Government Order Dated 29th August, 2020 for Stamp Duty Concession in Addition to ITP Regulation Concession. The Court held that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and the Petitioners are entitled to avail both concessions under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966.

22 Feb 2021

The Petitioners, Macrotech Developers Ltd. and Palava Dwellers Private Ltd., are companies engaged in real estate development. They filed a Writ Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death Not Arising Out of Employment. Deceased lineman died of heart attack while on duty but without any work-related strain; held not compensable under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

13 Apr 2023

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a single judgment and award dated 23.11.2001 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Tribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Maharashtra Stamp Act Amendment on Advertisements. Petition Seeks Declaration that Imposition of Stamp Duty on Mass Media Advertising Contracts is Unconstitutional and Void.

27 Oct 2016

The Advertising Agencies Association of India and several other entities representing advertising, newspaper publishing, and broadcasting sectors file...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Even if Used for Exempted Goods Prior to Common Use. The court held that the restriction under Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply when capital goods are used for both exempted and dutiable goods, and the assessee is entitled to credit if the goods are used in the manufacture of final products.

20 Jun 2018

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru, under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

6 Jan 2022

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Vessel Under Customs Act, 1962; Seizure of Re-imported Floating Crane Valid as Exemption Notification Inapplicable When Re-import Not by Original Exporter.

5 Apr 2019

The case involved a writ petition filed by Fomento Resources Private Limited and its director challenging the seizure of a floating crane, MV Maria La...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Notification Levying Central Excise on Tobacco Products — Notification No.3/2019-Central Excise dated 06.07.2019 held valid and within powers under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the government has the power to modify or withdraw exemptions in public interest and that promissory estoppel does not apply to legislative functions.

21 Sep 2022

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by manufacturers and dealers of tobacco and tobacco products, challenging Notification No.3/2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

25 Mar 2015

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Stamp Duty Dispute — Single Mortgage Deed Covering Multiple Loan Agreements Constitutes One Instrument Under Section 4 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Revisional Authority's Order Levying Deficit Stamp Duty and Penalty Quashed as Loan Agreements Were Ancillary to Principal Mortgage Deed.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Neepa Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., and its group company Sheth Creators Pvt. Ltd., engaged in real estate, sought financial assistance from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Water Sports Activities Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923 — Levy Not Ultra Vires Constitution. Court holds that water sports activities constitute 'entertainment' under Section 2(3) of the Act and that the proviso to Section 3(1) and Section 3(5A) are valid, but remits matter for determination of actual duty liability.

4 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Drishti Adventures Sports Private Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)