Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Benefit of Government Order Dated 29th August, 2020 for Stamp Duty Concession in Addition to ITP Regulation Concession. The Court held that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and the Petitioners are entitled to avail both concessions under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioners, Macrotech Developers Ltd. and Palava Dwellers Private Ltd., are companies engaged in real estate development. They filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions against the Respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Joint Sub-Registrars, to grant them the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in payment of stamp duty in addition to the concession in stamp duty provided for in the Regulations for development of Integrated Township Project (ITP Regulations). The ITP Regulations were framed by the Government exercising powers under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966. The Petitioners argued that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and they are entitled to avail both concessions. The Respondents opposed the petition, contending that the concessions are mutually exclusive. The Court analyzed the provisions of the Government Order and the ITP Regulations and held that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate concession and the Petitioners are entitled to the benefit of both concessions. The Court allowed the petition and directed the Respondents to grant the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in addition to the concession under the ITP Regulations.

Headnote

A) Stamp Duty - Concession - Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 - Integrated Township Project Regulations - The Petitioners sought benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in addition to the stamp duty concession under the ITP Regulations framed under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 - The Court held that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and the Petitioners are entitled to avail both concessions - The Court directed the Respondents to grant the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in addition to the concession under the ITP Regulations (Paras 1-28).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Petitioners are entitled to the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in payment of stamp duty in addition to the concession in stamp duty provided for in the Integrated Township Project Regulations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition and directed the Respondents to grant the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in addition to the concession under the ITP Regulations.

Law Points

  • Stamp duty concession
  • Government Order dated 29th August 2020
  • Integrated Township Project Regulations
  • Section 37(1AA)(c) of Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (02) 28

Writ Petition (St.) No.93915 of 2020

2021-02-22

K.K. Tated, R.I. Chagla

Mr. Amogh Singh with Mr. Jeet Gandhi i/b. D.P.Singh for the Petitioners, Mr. P.P. Kakade, Government Pleader with K.S. Thorat AGP for the State

Macrotech Developers Ltd. and Palava Dwellers Private Ltd.

State of Maharashtra, The Joint Sub-Registrar, Kalyan – 5, The Joint Sub Registrar, Class II Bhiwandi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to grant benefit of Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in payment of stamp duty in addition to concession under ITP Regulations.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought directions to Respondents to grant benefit of Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in addition to stamp duty concession under ITP Regulations.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed they were entitled to both concessions but Respondents refused to grant the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020.

Issues

Whether the Petitioners are entitled to the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in addition to the stamp duty concession under the ITP Regulations.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and they are entitled to avail both concessions. Respondents contended that the concessions are mutually exclusive and the Petitioners cannot avail both.

Ratio Decidendi

The Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and the Petitioners are entitled to avail both the concession under the ITP Regulations and the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners have filed this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions against the Respondents to grant the Petitioners the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in payment of stamp duty in addition to the concession in stamp duty provided for in the Regulations for development of Integrated Township Project.

Procedural History

The Petitioners filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court reserved order on 1st February, 2021 and pronounced order on 22nd February, 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 37(1AA)(c)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Apportionment of Liability Between Two Vehicles Determined. Negligence of KSRTC Bus Driver and Motorcycle Rider Established; Contributory Negligence Not Applicable.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Benefit of Government Order Dated 29th August, 2020 for Stamp Duty Concession in Addition to ITP Regulation Concession. The Court held that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and ...