Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

716 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 716 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Endorsement — Petitioner Failed to Establish Statutory Character of Impugned Action. The court held that the endorsement issued by the Assistant Commissioner was not a statutory order but a communication of information, and the petitioner had alternative remedies available under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

28 Jan 2025

The petitioner, The Koppal Oil and Refineries Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Sale Dispute — Unilateral Cancellation of Registered Sale Deed Held Invalid Without Consent or Court Order. A registered sale deed cannot be cancelled unilaterally by the vendor; cancellation requires mutual consent or a court decree under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the Registration Act, 1908.

22 Aug 2023

The case involves a property dispute where the original plaintiff (now represented by his legal heirs) filed a suit for declaration of title and posse...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Restored. Complainant's Evidence Sufficient to Prove Debt and Liability Despite Accused's Defence of Property Dispute.

28 Jul 2023

The appellant, Smt. F. Chandra, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

23 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title Upheld. The court held that the appellants failed to prove their title and possession over the suit property, and the concurrent findings of the courts below did not suffer from any perversity or substantial question of law.

12 Mar 2021

The case pertains to a suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellants (original defendants) in re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

25 Sep 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Mallinath Rajaram Harsure, who was originally accused No.1 in Special (ACB)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Prior Sale Deed Despite Purchaser's Absence During Registration Under Registration Act, 1908. Presence of purchaser not required under Section 32 of Registration Act, 1908 for registration of conveyance deed.

24 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by H.P. Puttaswamy (appellant) claiming ownership and possession of a prop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Sale Deed Interpretation and Possessory Title. Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove possession of the first floor at the time of sale and that the suit for possession based on title alone without prior possession is not maintainable under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

7 Jun 2016

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant (Shriram Thakur, since deceased, through his legal representatives) against the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Summary Suit for Recovery of Contractual Payment in Earth Filling Work Dispute. Court holds that plaintiff proved contract and performance, and defendant failed to prove defence of poor quality or inflated claims.

9 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai, carrying on business as a proprietress in civil construction works under the name M/s. Sterling Engineering Co.,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Trust Property — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Charitable Trust Land Requires Sanction Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Time Was Not of Essence but Plaintiff's Conduct Showed Lack of Readiness.

4 Mar 2015

The plaintiff, Bastion Constructions, a partnership firm engaged in building and development, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement fo...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)