KAHC010023912010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Section 202 enquiry"
632 result(s) found
Found 632 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.
1 Jan 1970The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.
1 Dec 2023The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.
11 Aug 2014The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.
1 Oct 2024The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...
- 368
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.
30 Jun 2025The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...
- 280
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."
23 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...
- 532
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.
1 Jan 1970These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Theft of Documents in Corporate Dispute — Internal Audit Reports and Confidential Documents Not 'Stolen' as They Were Obtained Through Legal Proceedings. The Court held that the ingredients of theft under Section 379 IPC are not satisfied when documents are obtained through legal proceedings and used in bona fide litigation, and continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
15 May 2019The appeals arise from a criminal complaint filed by Birla Corporation Limited (the appellant) against Adventz Investments and Holdings Limited and ot...
- 298
High Court
- 62
